[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001475#comment-13001475
]
Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-380:
-----------------------------------------
So db4o did get back to me. They would need typical things like contribution
agreements and full review control. You can see the response here:
http://developer.db4o.com/Forums/tabid/98/aft/10503/Default.aspx
I'm kinda leaning towards a fork but what does everyone think about their
constraints?
> Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENENET-380
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Build Automation, Lucene.Net Contrib, Lucene.Net Core,
> Lucene.Net Demo, Lucene.Net Test
> Reporter: George Aroush
> Assignee: Alex Thompson
> Attachments: 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_AfterPostProcessing.zip,
> 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_NoPostProcessing.zip, IndexWriter.java,
> Lucene.Net.3_0_3_Sharpen20110106.zip, Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101104.zip,
> Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101114.zip, NIOFSDirectory.java, QueryParser.java,
> TestBufferedIndexInput.java, TestDateFilter.java
>
>
> This task is to evaluate Sharpen as a port tool for Lucene.Net.
> The files to be evaluated are attached. We need to run those files (which
> are off Java Lucene 2.9.2) against Sharpen and compare the result against
> JLCA result.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
