Thanks for managing this release Upayavira!

There's a patch on the issue which resolves it but I'll wait for Noble to
commit it. I can do that as well, but he put up the original patch and also
assigned the issue to himself so don't want to be rude. :)

I think Noble would be able to commit this one when he wakes up tomorrow
morning his time, if not, I'll commit it.


On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote:

> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the
> feature freeze starts.
>
> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>
> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> issue with replication"
>
>   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>
>   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>   "Add tests for bin/post"
>
>   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> release
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>
>   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others),
> blocker
>   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>
>   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> consider this a blocker either.
>
>   - o -
>
> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention.
> Anyone have comments/observations here?
>
> I will create the branch shortly.
>
> Upayavira
>



-- 
Anshum Gupta

Reply via email to