[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002071#comment-13002071
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2822:
---------------------------------------
bq. I think we should stick with our private timer thread (and we should
definitely make it stop-able).
I think this is still the best reason, as both System.nanoTime() and
currentTimeMillies use system calls that are really expensive. But nanoTime()
has no wallclock problems, thats true, but is still a no-go for every collected
hit!
> TimeLimitingCollector starts thread in static {} with no way to stop them
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2822
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2822
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Robert Muir
>
> See the comment in LuceneTestCase.
> If you even do Class.forName("TimeLimitingCollector") it starts up a thread
> in a static method, and there isn't a way to kill it.
> This is broken.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
