[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-6917:
---------------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-6917.patch
This is mostly a "rote" rename, except there was some hair involved because I
moved {{precisionStep}} and {{NumericType}} out of core's {{FieldType}} and
down into the {{XXXField}} themselves.
This also required adding some deps on modules to {{backward-codecs}}, though I
was able to cutover at least {{lucene/demo}}'s usage to dimensional values ...
> Move NumericField out of core to backwards-codecs
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6917
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6917
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 6.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6917.patch
>
>
> DimensionalValues seems to be better across the board (indexing time,
> indexing size, search-speed, search-time heap required) than NumericField, at
> least in my testing so far.
> I think for 6.0 we should move {{IntField}}, {{LongField}}, {{FloatField}},
> {{DoubleField}} and {{NumericRangeQuery}} to {{backward-codecs}}, and rename
> with {{Legacy}} prefix?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
