[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15038858#comment-15038858
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on SOLR-5211:
--------------------------------

I thought i had made this straw many suggestion in some jira at some point, but 
I can't find it now....

I think a robust solution to dealing with multi-level nested documents and 
deletions (as i understand the rules of block joins) would be to extend the 
\_root\_ field concept to an \_ancestors\_ concept -- the  \_ancestors\_  field 
would be multivalued and contain the uniqueKey of every "ancestor" document, as 
well as the uniqueKey of the current document.

ie: if "id:parent" has 2 children then "id:child1" has both "parent" and 
"child1" in it's \_ancestors\_ field.  likewise if you have a deep hierarchy of 
"A(B(C,D),E(F(G,H),I(J)))" then the \_ancestors\_ field for "H" would contain 
"A E H"

This then means that any deleteById or deleteByQuery that involves the 
uniqueKey field can/should be re-rewitten to be a delete ased on that term 
value against the \_ancestors\_, so that all decendents of the uniqueKey 
specified are deleted.

(not sure how to do this in a back compat way, but an idea i wanted to throw 
out there)

> updating parent as childless makes old children orphans
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5211
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: update
>    Affects Versions: 4.5, Trunk
>            Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
>            Assignee: Mikhail Khludnev
>             Fix For: Trunk, 5.5
>
>
> if I have parent with children in the index, I can send update omitting 
> children. as a result old children become orphaned. 
> I suppose separate \_root_ fields makes much trouble. I propose to extend 
> notion of uniqueKey, and let it spans across blocks that makes updates 
> unambiguous.  
> WDYT? Do you like to see a test proves this issue?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to