[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ishan Chattopadhyaya updated SOLR-8373:
---------------------------------------
    Attachment: SOLR-8373.patch

Added test cases, minor refactoring here and there. I did some end to end 
testing and the changes look good to me thus far.

Was just wondering if the change to have all authentication and authorization 
plugins now accept a CoreContainer warrants a separate issue?

> KerberosPlugin: Using multiple nodes on same machine leads clients to fetch 
> TGT for every request
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-8373
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8373
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>            Assignee: Noble Paul
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: SOLR-8373.patch, SOLR-8373.patch, SOLR-8373.patch, 
> SOLR-8373.patch
>
>
> Kerberized solr nodes accept negotiate/spnego/kerberos requests and processes 
> them. It also passes back to the client a cookie called "hadoop.auth" (which 
> is currently unused, but will eventually be used for delegation tokens). 
> If two or more nodes are on the same machine, they all send out the cookie 
> which have the same domain (hostname) and same path, but different cookie 
> values.
> Upon receipt at the client, if a cookie is rejected (which in this case will 
> be), the client compulsorily gets a ​​*new*​​ TGT from the KDC instead of 
> reading the same ticket from the ticketcache. This is causing the heavy 
> traffic at the KDC, plus intermittent "Request is a replay" (which indicates 
> race condition at KDC while handing out the TGT for the same principal).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to