[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15072706#comment-15072706
]
Dennis Gove commented on SOLR-8467:
-----------------------------------
I can't think of any reason why accepting a [Modifiable]SolrParams object
instead of a Map<String,String> would be a bad idea. I like this change.
> CloudSolrStream should take a SolrParams object rather than a Map<String,
> String> to allow more complex Solr queries to be specified
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8467
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8467
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Erick Erickson
> Assignee: Erick Erickson
> Attachments: SOLR-8647.patch
>
>
> Currently, it's impossible to, say, specify multiple "fq" clauses when using
> Streaming Aggregation due to the fact that the c'tors take a Map of params.
> Opening to discuss whether we should
> 1> deprecate the current c'tor
> and/or
> 2> add a c'tor that takes a SolrParams object instead.
> and/or
> 3> ???
> I don't see a clean way to go from a Map<String, String> to a
> (Modifiable)SolrParams, so existing code would need a significant change. I
> hacked together a PoC, just to see if I could make CloudSolrStream take a
> ModifiableSolrParams object instead and it passes tests, but it's so bad that
> I'm not going to even post it. There's _got_ to be a better way to do this,
> but at least it's possible....
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
