[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tomás Fernández Löbbe updated LUCENE-6965:
------------------------------------------
    Attachment: LUCENE-6965.patch

bq. why the intermediate exception?
I couldn't find a better way to propagate the exception. Throwing 
ParseException from the visitor can't be done, since the visitor is called from 
RuleContext.accept, which doesn't throw any exceptions. 
I wouldn't want to catch a general IllegalArgumentException to convert it to 
ParseException, something unexpected inside visitor.visit could throw an 
IllegalArgumentException and I don't want to change the type of that.

bq. Also, it looks like you are losing stack frames when creating a new 
exception from the intermediate.
Yes, unfortunately the ParseException doesn't support providing a cause in the 
constructor. I can add the cause by using: {{exception.initCause(e);}}. 
Attached new patch with this change and made the intermediate exception static

> Expression's JavascriptCompiler to throw ParseExceptions with bad function 
> names or arity
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6965
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>         Attachments: LUCENE-6965.patch, LUCENE-6965.patch
>
>
> Currently JavascriptCompiler will throw IllegalArgumentException for bad 
> function names (or functions that don't exist) and for bad arity. I can see 
> why this was done this way, but I believe ParseException would also be 
> correct and it would be better since that's the exception clients will be 
> prepared to receive.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to