awesome thanks! simon
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:54 AM, David Nemeskey <nemeskey.da...@sztaki.hu> wrote: > Ok, I have created a new issue, LUCENE-2959 for this project. I have uploaded > the pdfs and added the gsoc2011 and lucene-gsoc-2011 labels as well. > > David > > On 2011 March 09, Wednesday 21:58:53 Simon Willnauer wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> > I think we, Lucene committers, need to identify who is willing to mentor. >> > In my experience, it is less than 5 hours a week. Most of the work >> > is done as part of the community. Sometimes you have to be tough and >> > fail someone (I did last year) but most of the time, if you take the >> > time to interview the candidates up front, it is a good experience for >> > everyone. >> >> count me in >> >> > I'd add it would be useful to have everyone put the lucene-gsoc-11 label >> > on their issues too, that way we can quickly find the Lucene ones. >> >> done on at least one ;) >> >> simon >> >> > Also, feel free to label existing bugs. >> > >> > On Mar 9, 2011, at 2:11 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote: >> >> Hey David and all others who want to contribute to GSoC, >> >> >> >> the ASF has applied for GSoC 2011 as a mentoring organization. As a >> >> ASF project we don't need to apply directly though but we need to >> >> register our ideas now. This works like almost anything in the ASF >> >> through JIRA. All ideas should be recorded as JIRA tickets labeled >> >> with "gsoc2011". Once this is done it will show up here: >> >> http://s.apache.org/gsoc2011tasks >> >> >> >> Everybody who is interested in GSoC as a mentor or student should now >> >> read this too http://community.apache.org/gsoc.html >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Simon >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:14 PM, David Nemeskey >> >> >> >> <nemeskey.da...@sztaki.hu> wrote: >> >>> Please find the implementation plan attached. The word "soon" gets a >> >>> new meaning when power outages are taken into account. :) >> >>> >> >>> As before, comments are welcome. >> >>> >> >>> David >> >>> >> >>> On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 15:22:57 Simon Willnauer wrote: >> >>>> I think that is good for now. I should get started on codeawards and >> >>>> wrap up our proposals. I hope I can do that this week. >> >>>> >> >>>> simon >> >>>> >> >>>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:16 PM, David Nemeskey >> >>>> >> >>>> <nemeskey.da...@sztaki.hu> wrote: >> >>>>> Hey, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I have written the proposal. Please let me know if you want more / >> >>>>> less of certain parts. Should I upload it somewhere? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Implementation plan soon to follow. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Sorry for the late reply; I have been rather busy these past few >> >>>>> weeks. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> David >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 10:35:55 Simon Willnauer wrote: >> >>>>>> Hey David, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I saw that you added a tiny line to the GSoC Lucene wiki - thanks >> >>>>>> for that. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:10 AM, David Nemeskey >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> <nemeskey.da...@sztaki.hu> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Hi guys, >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Mark, Robert, Simon: thanks for the support! I really hope we can >> >>>>>>> work together this summer (and before that, obviously). >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Same here! >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> According to http://www.google- >> >>>>>>> melange.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2011/timeline , >> >>>>>>> there's still some time until the application period. So let me use >> >>>>>>> this week to finish my PhD research plan, and get back to you next >> >>>>>>> week. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I am not really familiar with how the program works, i.e. how >> >>>>>>> detailed the application description should be, when mentorship is >> >>>>>>> decided, etc. so I guess we will have a lot to talk about. :) >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> so from a 10000ft view it work like this: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> 1. Write up a short proposal what your idea is about >> >>>>>> 2. make it public! and publish a implementation plan - how you would >> >>>>>> want to realize your proposal. If you don't follow that 100% in the >> >>>>>> actual impl. don't worry. Its just mean to give us an idea that you >> >>>>>> know what you are doing and where you want to go. something like a 1 >> >>>>>> A4 rough design doc. >> >>>>>> 3. give other people the change to apply for the same suggestion >> >>>>>> (this is how it works though) >> >>>>>> 4 Let the ASF / us assign one or more possible mentors to it >> >>>>>> 5. let us apply for a slot in GSoC (those are limited for >> >>>>>> organizations) 6. get accepted >> >>>>>> 7. rock it! >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> (Actually, should we move this discussion private?) >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> no - we usually do everything in public except of discussion within >> >>>>>> the PMC that are meant to be private for legal reasons or similar >> >>>>>> things. Lets stick to the mailing list for all communication except >> >>>>>> you have something that should clearly not be public. This also give >> >>>>>> other contributors a chance to help and get interested in your >> >>>>>> work!! >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> simon >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> David >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Hi David, honestly this sounds fantastic. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> It would be great to have someone to work with us on this issue! >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> To date, progress is pretty slow-going (minor improvements, >> >>>>>>>> cleanups, additional stats here and there)... but we really need >> >>>>>>>> all the help we can get, especially from people who have a really >> >>>>>>>> good understanding of the various models. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> In case you are interested, here are some references to >> >>>>>>>> discussions about adding more flexibility (with some prototypes >> >>>>>>>> etc): >> >>>>>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/72787e0e54f798e4/ >> >>>>>>>> baby _st eps _towards_making_lucene_s_scoring_more_flexible >> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:32 AM, David Nemeskey >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> <nemeskey.da...@sztaki.hu> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I have already sent this mail to Simon Willnauer, and he >> >>>>>>>>> suggested me to post it here for discussion. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I am David Nemeskey, a PhD student at the Eotvos Lorand >> >>>>>>>>> University, Budapest, Hungary. I am doing an IR-related >> >>>>>>>>> research, and we have considered using Lucene as our search >> >>>>>>>>> engine. We were quite satisfied with the speed and ease of use. >> >>>>>>>>> However, we would like to experiment with different ranking >> >>>>>>>>> algorithms, and this is where problems arise. Lucene only >> >>>>>>>>> supports the VSM, and unfortunately the ranking architecture >> >>>>>>>>> seems to be tailored specifically to its needs. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I would be very much interested in revamping the ranking >> >>>>>>>>> component as a GSoC project. The following modifications should >> >>>>>>>>> be doable in the allocated time frame: >> >>>>>>>>> - a new ranking class hierarchy, which is generic enough to allow >> >>>>>>>>> easy implementation of new weighting schemes (at least >> >>>>>>>>> bag-of-words ones), - addition of state-of-the-art ranking >> >>>>>>>>> methods, such as Okapi BM25, proximity and DFR models, >> >>>>>>>>> - configuration for ranking selection, with the old method as >> >>>>>>>>> default. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I believe all users of Lucene would profit from such a project. >> >>>>>>>>> It would provide the scientific community with an even more >> >>>>>>>>> useful research aid, while regular users could benefit from >> >>>>>>>>> superior ranking results. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Please let me know your opinion about this proposal. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>>>> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>>>> >> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> > -------------------------- >> > Grant Ingersoll >> > http://www.lucidimagination.com/ >> > >> > Search the Lucene ecosystem docs using Solr/Lucene: >> > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
