[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15106641#comment-15106641
 ] 

Daniel Collins commented on SOLR-839:
-------------------------------------

I think this broke the Maven build option within Solr, due to a new dependency. 
The XML Parser test code is now dependent on Lucene test code, which the maven 
pom.xml files don't allow for.

Will create a new JIRA and issue a patch to fix that.

> XML Query Parser support (deftype=xmlparser)
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-839
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-839
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: query parsers
>    Affects Versions: 1.3, 5.4, Trunk
>            Reporter: Erik Hatcher
>            Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 5.5, Trunk
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-839-object-parser.patch, SOLR-839.patch, 
> SOLR-839.patch, SOLR-839.patch, lucene-xml-query-parser-2.4-dev.jar
>
>
> Lucene includes a query parser that is able to create the full-spectrum of 
> Lucene queries, using an XML data structure.
> This patch adds "xml" query parser support to Solr.
> Example (from 
> {{lucene/queryparser/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/xml/NestedBooleanQuery.xml}}):
> {code}
> <BooleanQuery fieldName="contents">  
>   <Clause occurs="should">
>     <BooleanQuery fieldName="contents">
>       <Clause occurs="must">
>         
> <TermQuery>doesNotExistButShouldBeOKBecauseOtherClauseExists</TermQuery>
>       </Clause>
>     </BooleanQuery>
>   </Clause>
>   <Clause occurs="should">
>     <TermQuery>bank</TermQuery>
>   </Clause>
> </BooleanQuery>
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to