[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Khludnev updated SOLR-8466:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: SOLR-8466.patch
ok. Attaching [^SOLR-8466.patch]. I understood an encapsulation challenge.
Instead of ripping json facet framework I introduce factory method
{{o.a.s.s.facet.FacetProcessor.createProcessor(SolrQueryRequest, Map<String,
Object>, DocSet)}} that minimizes impact on codebase. [~ysee...@gmail.com]
what's your perception about it?
I also removed exclude-aware docset calculation, because it's already handled
at {{..SimpleFacets.parseParams(String, String)}}. So, far it lacks of test
coverage for distributed faceting and fq exclusion.
Opinions?
> Add support for UnInvertedField based faceting to FacetComponent
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8466
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Facet Module, faceting
> Affects Versions: 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.2.1, 5.3, 5.3.1, 5.4
> Reporter: Jamie Johnson
> Assignee: Mikhail Khludnev
> Attachments: 8466.diff, SOLR-8466.patch
>
>
> The new JSON Faceting API supports building an UnInvertedField to do faceting
> which would be beneficial to add to Solr FacetComponent. This would provide
> additional options to implementors to choose the appropriate method of
> faceting for their particular use case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
