+1; I can't see how anyone would object to adding/retaining support for the tool. Nobody is forced to use it.
I'm curious of the move to Git allows for possibly better options. I've heard good things about Gerrit but I've never tried it. I have mixed feelings of my experience with Reviewboard, but *anything* beats reviewing big patch files! Mark, Greg what do you guys think? I recall you two used it too. On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:33 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > Looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7630 set up the > original/existing review board. If there are no objections or existing > ticket then I will raise a similar ticket towards the end of this week. > > Christine > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: dev@lucene.apache.org > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > At: Jan 26 2016 15:18:22 > > Hello. > > Having not used it before, I'd like to try out reviews.apache.org (even > though it's only been used a few times for the project in the past based on > the https://reviews.apache.org/groups/lucene/ listing). > > The review board seems so far unware of the svn-to-git migration. Other > projects have dual listings e.g. hive and hive-git or zookeeper and > zookeeper-git. > > If no one else is looking yet then I'd be happy to look into setting up a > lucene-solr-git reviews.apache.org entry? > > Christine > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
