Ah; it was you :-)

~ David

> On Jan 29, 2016, at 10:55 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Oh, I also changed this already. Looks like a conflict at OpenHUB J
>  
> Anyways, both projects now have the official read-only git:// URL enlisted. 
> For external usage (read-only) ASF prefers to use the git:// URL (also for 
> Jenkins), because the protocol is much faster to clone, which is important 
> for Jenkins and OpenHUB.
>  
> Uwe
>  
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
> eMail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>  
> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] 
> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 4:47 PM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Updating whoweare page
>  
> Thanks for this cleanup Jan.
>  
> I'm not sure how useful the date of joining is.  It's not a proxy for who is 
> active, which is more useful but also hard to capture.  Perhaps we could link 
> to BlackDuck's "OpenHub" (formerly oholoh.net <http://oholoh.net/> or 
> something like that; it was a terrible name I always typo'ed) 
> https://www.openhub.net/p/solr/contributors/summary 
> <https://www.openhub.net/p/solr/contributors/summary>
> https://www.openhub.net/p/lucene/contributors/summary 
> <https://www.openhub.net/p/lucene/contributors/summary>
> Note: I went there and realized they weren't aware of our move to GitHub.  
> I'm in the process of updating this info for Lucene and Solr on OpenHub.  So 
> depending on when you view this and how long it takes them, what you see 
> could be incomplete.
>  
> Cheers,
> ~ David
>  
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:49 AM Shawn Heisey <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> On 1/29/2016 3:11 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
>> > The page https://lucene.apache.org/whoweare.html 
>> > <https://lucene.apache.org/whoweare.html> used to be sorted on last name. 
>> > However somewhere along the way things got messed up and new committers 
>> > started adding themselves to the end of the list.
>> >
>> > I have re-sorted the list, and want your consent to publish the changes. 
>> > Please review the staging site 
>> > http://lucene.staging.apache.org/whoweare.html 
>> > <http://lucene.staging.apache.org/whoweare.html> as well as the diff: 
>> > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20080302/whoweare.patch 
>> > <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20080302/whoweare.patch> and verify 
>> > that I have not messed up anything :-)
>> 
>> There is one thing the current sort gives somebody who looks at the page
>> -- an idea of who's new and who isn't. :)
>> 
>> I have no strong objection to your proposal.  If it had been sorted when
>> I added my name, I would have put it in the middle of the list instead
>> of the end and thought nothing of it.
>> 
>> I do wonder if maybe there's a record of the date that each committer
>> joined, and whether it would be appropriate to include that information?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Shawn
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
> -- 
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley 
> <http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley> | Book: 
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com 
> <http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com/>

Reply via email to