+1 for 5.5.0 release. Am about to mark SOLR-8621 as a blocker, it's basically 'done' (with collaboration and help from Shai) but a signature change for MergePolicyFactory will be needed to support SOLR-5730 (which ideally would also be included in 5.5.0 and which hopefully can be wrapped up this week also, patch update to follow later today).
Sorry for not speaking up about these two tickets earlier, I had optimistically thought that they would be done-and-dusted by 'mid this week' but it didn't quite turn out like that ... Christine ----- Original Message ----- From: dev@lucene.apache.org To: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Feb 5 2016 10:17:40 Thanks Nick and Anshum, I'll volunteer to be RM. If there are blocker 5.5 issues, please mark them as such in Jira, thanks! I don't think we are rushing here ... it was a little under a month ago when I had thought "in or week or two" let's cut the 6.x branch ;) I see 5.5 release as just getting all the (stable) backported features out to the world before we release 6.0.0. I'll aim to cut the 5.5 branch mid next week... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: > I have a few things I'd like to get in. I hope to get those in by next week. > > I think the 5.5 release is an important one for us as the cleanup in 6.0 > depends on it. We shouldn't rush it. > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +1 for 5.5.0 release. I have 2 issues I'd like to get in for 5.5: >> LUCENE-6930 and LUCENE-6997 which changes GeoPoint encoding (boosting >> performance), and graduates these features from sandbox. They should be >> ready by Monday (or sooner). >> >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Michael McCandless >> <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think we are in good shape now for 6.0.0? >>> >>> git cutover is done and seems to be going well except for how we name >>> branches >>> >>> Dimensional values are renamed to point values, the API is cleaned up >>> a bit, and you can now search for == (not just ranges), and >>> StoredDocument is removed. >>> >>> We should first do a 5.5.0 release to get all the goodness back-ported >>> 5.x features out, and also smoke-test our first git-based release. >>> Does anyone want to volunteer as RM? >>> >>> Mike McCandless >>> >>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:52 PM Michael McCandless >>> > <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I agree it would be nice to have cutover to git by then: are we ready >>> >> to open an INFRA issue to do the hard cutover? Or do we still have >>> >> things to do on our end? (Thank you Dawid and Mark and Paul and Uwe >>> >> and everyone else for pushing hard on this front!). >>> > >>> > >>> > We are fairly close - just one last thing to come to consensus on. >>> > Remains >>> > to be seen how fast INFRA reacts for us though. >>> > >>> > There will also probably be a bit to do as we work through the first >>> > release, in terms of release scripts, docs, etc. I think most of it >>> > should >>> > be fairly light weight changes though. >>> > >>> > - Mark >>> > -- >>> > - Mark >>> > about.me/markrmiller >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> > > > > -- > Anshum Gupta --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
