[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15154939#comment-15154939
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-8697:
-----------------------------------
bq. Bringing in Curator at some point would be something I'd only advocate for
incrementally and in pieces, like replace our DQ with Curator's, etc.
Yeah, I suppose if we had some consensus to push it forward over time, that's a
viable option.
bq. If an outside party forcibly deletes our node, we should put ourselves at
the back of the line.
Yeah, that sounds like an interesting improvement. Much nicer than making a
bunch of distrib calls.
> Fix LeaderElector issues
> ------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8697
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8697
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SolrCloud
> Affects Versions: 5.4.1
> Reporter: Scott Blum
> Labels: patch, reliability, solrcloud
> Attachments: SOLR-8697.patch
>
>
> This patch is still somewhat WIP for a couple of reasons:
> 1) Still debugging test failures.
> 2) This will more scrutiny from knowledgable folks!
> There are some subtle bugs with the current implementation of LeaderElector,
> best demonstrated by the following test:
> 1) Start up a small single-node solrcloud. it should be become Overseer.
> 2) kill -9 the solrcloud process and immediately start a new one.
> 3) The new process won't become overseer. The old process's ZK leader elect
> node has not yet disappeared, and the new process fails to set appropriate
> watches.
> NOTE: this is only reproducible if the new node is able to start up and join
> the election quickly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
