[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15186461#comment-15186461
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-6741:
--------------------------------------
Bah: Then I just looked and LUCENE-5879 is already committed so I don't think
committing an IPV4-only type is a good idea. So I'll un-assign it to myself as
I won't have time to enhance this patch to work on both any time soon.
It would still be a good thing for IPV4 to be more efficient space-wise than
IPV6, possibly based on a hint in the schema. That said, I have no clue whether
LUCENE-5879 already "does the right thing" here.
The unit tests in this patch are pretty cool IIRC, so if anything is done with
this it'd be a good idea to use them as a base for IPV6-specific tests.
> IPv6 Field Type
> ---------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6741
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6741
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Lloyd Ramey
> Assignee: Erick Erickson
> Attachments: SOLR-6741.patch
>
>
> It would be nice if Solr had a field type which could be used to index IPv6
> data and supported efficient range queries.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
