[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15186972#comment-15186972
 ] 

yuejianjun commented on LUCENE-6227:
------------------------------------

/**
         * filter 查询结果(Filter 过滤查询)。 filter=id:1,2
         */
        @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
        public TermsFilter getTermsFilter(String filter) {
                try {
                        if (filter != null && filter.length() > 0) {
                                String[] arrFilter = filter.split(":");
                                if (arrFilter.length != 2) {
                                        return null;
                                }
                                String key = arrFilter[0];
                                String[] values = arrFilter[1].split(",");
                                List<Term> listTerms = new ArrayList<Term>();
                                for (String value : values) {
                                        listTerms.add(new Term(key, value));
                                }
                                if (listTerms.size() > 0) {
                                        return new TermsFilter(listTerms);
                                }
                        }
                } catch (Exception e) {
                        logger.error("SearchQuery getTermsFilter is error", e);
                }
                return null;
        }

search id=1 or id=2 
how to  use  BooleanClause.Occur.FILTER replace ?


> Add BooleanClause.Occur.FILTER
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6227
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6227
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Assignee: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 5.1, master
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-6227.patch, LUCENE-6227.patch, LUCENE-6227.patch, 
> LUCENE-6227.patch, LUCENE-6227.patch
>
>
> Now that we have weight-level control of whether scoring is needed or not, we 
> could add a new clause type to BooleanQuery. It would behave like MUST exept 
> that it would not participate in scoring.
> Why do we need it given that we already have FilteredQuery? The idea is that 
> by having a single query that performs conjunctions, we could potentially 
> take better decisions. It's not ready to replace FilteredQuery yet as 
> FilteredQuery has handling of random-access filters that BooleanQuery 
> doesn't, but it's a first step towards that direction and eventually 
> FilteredQuery would just rewrite to a BooleanQuery.
> I've been calling this new clause type FILTER so far, but feel free to 
> propose a better name.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to