[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15191090#comment-15191090
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-8831:
------------------------------------
bq. they are just two different implementations of the logical concept of
storing data for later retreival
I agree - I've been occasionally using the term "row stored" and "column
stored".
While we won't be able to totally squash the terms "stored" or "docValues"
(too much history), in certain contexts it will certainly be easier to use an
all encompassing term like "retrievable". I'll update this patch to reflect
that unless someone comes up with a better word for it.
> allow _version_ field to be unstored
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8831
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Attachments: SOLR-8831.patch
>
>
> Right now, one is prohibited from having an unstored _version_ field, even if
> docValues are enabled.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
