On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, actually I think we should just make it completely unsupported. These > are our dev tools - don't count on them for crap. No reason to exclude them > from the src IMO. >
For the solr release, I think I could be ok with that (my concerns are more that later someone will say, how did this eclipse stuff etc slip into the release?). I know some people hesitated to add support for IDEs for this reason, I was for it as I want to make contributions easier, but I don't want us to look at it as making releasing harder. For the lucene release, I'm definitely against it: nothing in there will work at all because the lucene release doesn't include the solr bits. I know its been mentioned in this thread that maybe we should look at a single source artifact for everything, I don't think we should do this either. I think its important that lucene stays a standalone search engine library from the artifact point of view, even if our development is in sync with solr. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
