[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15239738#comment-15239738
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-8933:
-----------------------------------

bq. ServletInputStreamWrapper

Let's add a class comment that mentions why this exists.

bq. +      if (System.getProperty("jetty.testMode") != null && !retry) {

I really don't like introducing any memory barriers for this at such an 
important code path. I wonder if we could use an assert and private method 
somehow. 

It seems that even if it works, it's less than ideal to make it a static member 
and count on initialize vs setting the test sys prop order, but perhaps that is 
an option as well?

bq. new CloseShieldInputStream

I think it's worth adding a small comment when we use this that says something 
like: protect container owned streams from being closed by Solr, see SOLR-8933

bq.  log.warn("", new IOException("Attempted close of request input stream."));

Since this is test logging, perhaps it should be ERROR so that violators feel 
worse about it if they see the logging. Warnings are easy to ignore.

> SolrDispatchFilter::consumeInput logs "Stream Closed" IOException
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-8933
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8933
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.10.3
>            Reporter: Mike Drob
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>         Attachments: SOLR-8933.patch, SOLR-8933.patch, SOLR-8933.patch, 
> SOLR-8933.patch, SOLR-8933.patch, SOLR-8933.patch, SOLR-8933.patch
>
>
> After SOLR-8453 we started seeing some IOExceptions coming out of 
> SolrDispatchFilter with "Stream Closed" messages.
> It looks like we are indeed closing the request stream in several places when 
> we really need to be letting the web container handle their life cycle. I've 
> got a preliminary patch ready and am working on testing it to make sure there 
> are no regressions.
> A very strange piece of this is that I have been entirely unable to reproduce 
> it on a unit test, but have seen it on cluster deployment quite consistently.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to