On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr >> >> I disagree strongly with the sentiment that queries don't belong in Solr. >> Everything developed in/for lucene need not be exported to Solr immediately. >> Everything developed in/for solr need not be exported to Lucene immediately. >> >> If the work has been done, and the patch works for Solr, that should >> be enough. Period. >> > > Its not enough for me: you can expect me to start raising questions > and objections when things are committed to the wrong place in the > codebase, its totally appropriate. We merged development, all > committers can commit to the correct places, there are no excuses.
If you're saying "Queries don't belong in Solr", I'm a huge -1 on that. There's no "correct" place for queries in general - it's all in the context. If there's a better place for the query that can be achieved with a "mv", then fine. But there's often much more work involved, dependencies on other solr features, or fleshing out a real Java API rather than treating something as simple implementation. -Yonik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
