[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-7242:
--------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-7242.patch
Initial patch: seems to make things a bit faster:
Synthetic polygons from luceneUtil
||vertices||old QPS||new QPS|
|5|38.4|41.1|
|50|29.7|33.1|
|500|27.5|30.5|
|5000|18.8|20.1|
Real polygons (33 london districts:
http://data.london.gov.uk/2011-boundary-files)
||vertices||old QPS||new QPS|
|avg 5.6k|73.0|84.7|
I want to check that startup cost is not hurt, otherwise I think its better.
startup cost may be improved.
> LatLonTree should build a balanced tree
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7242
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-7242.patch
>
>
> [~rjernst]'s idea: we create an interval tree of edges, but with randomized
> order.
> Instead we can speed things up more by creating a balanced tree up front.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
