[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15256265#comment-15256265
 ] 

Markus Jelsma commented on SOLR-7580:
-------------------------------------

Checked again today, this problem still applies but not when querying on the 
uniqueKey field.

> Number of ScoreDoc instances equals rows parameter, not actual number of 
> matches
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-7580
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7580
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 5.1
>            Reporter: Markus Jelsma
>             Fix For: 5.5, master
>
>
> We have several batch jobs that use StreamingResponseCallback to collect all 
> records matching a specific query. For each record, we execute a new query 
> and need all results without paging through them. Because we do not know the 
> amount of matches to expect, we do setRows(Integer.MAX_VALUE);. According to 
> the VisualVM samples, this results in a huge amount of ScoreDoc instances, 
> making the query unreasonably slow.
> The current work-around we use is to execute the same query with setRows(0), 
> get numResults, and then reissue the query with setRows(numResults). This is 
> fast, almost as fast as one would expect.
> This is, however, a very dirty work-around. I am unsure whether this is a 
> Solr or Lucene issue, SolrIndexSearcher is a beast to debug ;)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to