no worries, just wanted to get a sense for the timing. Thanks for the update

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Tim, Sorry about going slow but there were a ton of back-ports.
> I'm just waiting on Yonik or someone else who understands things better to
> back-port SOLR-8886 and SOLR-8885. I just got done with back-porting
> everything else earlier today so I'll be ready to spin the RC as soon as
> those two are done. If they aren't done by tomorrow morning, I'll have an RC
> out without those anyways.
> Are you generally enquiring ?
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Timothy Potter <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Anshum,
>>
>> What's the status of 5.5.1 RC1?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Timothy Potter <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > it's in, thanks! b3fe7f7..9820406  branch_5_5 -> branch_5_5
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >> I trust you Tim! Go for it.
>> >>
>> >> I wouldn't even commit to review this as there's a lot of stuff on my
>> >> plate.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Timothy Potter <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi Anshum,
>> >>>
>> >>> I'd like to include the fix for
>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9007 into 5.5.1. It's super
>> >>> minor (w/ very low risk) and patch is ready. I'd like it to be
>> >>> included because it gives a poor getting started experience if the
>> >>> user selects managed_schema_configs b/c it doesn't exist anymore.
>> >>>
>> >>> Tim
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Anshum Gupta
>> >>> <[email protected]>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > Cassandra, I don't plan on back porting all bug fixes from 6.0 but
>> >>> > only
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > ones that I understand and don't require invasive code changes. I am
>> >>> > open to
>> >>> > others helping out and back-porting stuff that they understand as
>> >>> > long
>> >>> > as
>> >>> > it's communicated.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Cassandra Targett
>> >>> > <[email protected]>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Anshum, Is your plan to backport all the bug fixes that were
>> >>> >> released
>> >>> >> in
>> >>> >> 6.0 to 5.5.1? Or do you have a selection process you plan to use?
>> >>> >> Just
>> >>> >> curious mostly.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Timothy Potter
>> >>> >> <[email protected]>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> 8908 is on branch_5_5 now (14ec48a)
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Anshum Gupta
>> >>> >>> <[email protected]>
>> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> > As Yonik mentioned, I wouldn't be cutting a branch but directly
>> >>> >>> > spinning an
>> >>> >>> > RC. I have a few things on my plate so I think I'll only be able
>> >>> >>> > to
>> >>> >>> > get
>> >>> >>> > to
>> >>> >>> > it over the weekend or by Monday, so you still have some time.
>> >>> >>> > I wouldn't rush the release specially as this seems like a good
>> >>> >>> > candidate
>> >>> >>> > for 5.5.1.
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Noble Paul
>> >>> >>> > <[email protected]>
>> >>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> When do you plan to cut a branch, I hope we can include
>> >>> >>> >> SOLR-8662
>> >>> >>> >> into
>> >>> >>> >> the
>> >>> >>> >> release
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Bram Van Dam
>> >>> >>> >> <[email protected]>
>> >>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> On 13/04/16 19:26, Anshum Gupta wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>> > Can you please test it with 5.5.1 so someone could back port
>> >>> >>> >>> > it.
>> >>> >>> >>> > Thanks.
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> I've finished testing SOLR-8145 on branch_5_5. Patch applies
>> >>> >>> >>> cleanly
>> >>> >>> >>> and
>> >>> >>> >>> the bugfix works fine. I don't have commit access, so someone
>> >>> >>> >>> else
>> >>> >>> >>> will
>> >>> >>> >>> have to take care of that part.
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> git cherry-pick 80801a2 does the trick.
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>>  - Bram
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>> >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >>> >> -----------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >>> >> Noble Paul
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > --
>> >>> >>> > Anshum Gupta
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > Anshum Gupta
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Anshum Gupta
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to