Mike, there were 3 bug fixes as per the change log. Also, no fixes != no bugs :).
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Michael McCandless < [email protected]> wrote: > I think there were no Lucene changes in this release vs 5.5.0? > > So maybe the release notes should simply say: > > Lucene is perfect and has no bugs. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix something >> that I missed, >> >> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote551 >> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote551 >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980] >>> >>> Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> a >>> écrit : >>> >>>> FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so >>>> we'd be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out. >>>> Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1. >>>>> >>>>> Artifacts: >>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58 >>>>> >>>>> Smoke tester: >>>>> >>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here's my +1: >>>>> >>>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268] >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Anshum Gupta >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Anshum Gupta >> > > -- Anshum Gupta
