Here are three that I just happened upon and was semi familiar with: * SOLR-8097 * SOLR-9058 * SOLR-8878
Looks like they just need to be resolved properly and fix the fixVersion. there might be just as many open issues w/o a fixVersion that warrant equal > review/edits. Yea that is probably true. I The recent work on JIRA and "Street Light Effect" as you say can be good to get JIRA cleaned up further :) I don't plan on putting much effort into it currently but definitely opened my eyes to what more can be done. Kevin Risden On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote: > > : I wasn't suggesting a blanket resolve of issues. There are a few that I > : looked at that should have been resolved and weren't. This would require > : some manual effort. > > can you give some examples? > > I was reading "resolved" as "FIXED" but if you're talking about issues > that could/should be marked WONT_FIX or CANT_REPRO or DUP then i suspect > you're just falling for the "Street Light Effect" ... the recent work and > 6.0 happened to catch your eye, and you notice some of those open 6.0 > issues could/should be resolved, but that doesn't mean there is anything > special about open issues with 6.0 set on them ... there might be just as > many open issues w/o a fixVersion that warrant equal review/edits. > > : Since there isn't a problem here that open and fixVersion doesn't mean > : anything together, I'm fine with just leaving as is. > > I don't think there is, and i don't subscribe any meaning to it, but > that's just my opinion. > > if other folks *want* to subscribe meaning to it that will be an uphill > battle unless some work is done to change our workflow and lock down jira > to prevent arbitrary fixVersons from bieng added to issues. > > > -Hoss > http://www.lucidworks.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
