: > : Back when we used 4.4.0 I believe a query with rows=-1 returned all : > matching
: > Nope -- that's never been how rows=-1 behaved. : Believe you are wrong. That was how it behaved in 4.4.0 Nope -- not in a regular search it didn't... hossman@tray:~/lucene/lucene_solr_4_4_0_tag/solr/example/exampledocs$ curl 'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&indent=true&rows=-1' <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <response> <lst name="responseHeader"> <int name="status">0</int> <int name="QTime">0</int> <lst name="params"> <str name="q">*:*</str> <str name="indent">true</str> <str name="rows">-1</str> </lst> </lst> <result name="response" numFound="32" start="0"> </result> </response> ...your subsequent comments however suggest you may have been refering solely to the *grouping* component -- but you didn't mention that in your original email. Based on the jira comments you linked to (SOLR-7254) i guess perhaps that's how grouping worked in 4.4, but wether it was actually intended or not and/or why that behavior may have changed since -- i have no idea. And as for wether yonik did/didn't ever intend to support it in regular searches: i have no idea -- If he says he planned on it then i guess maybe he planned on it, but it's never actually been supported, and when suggested in the past it's been argued against heavily as a "miss feature" in the past (see SOLR-534) and discouraging people from expecting this to ever work in general search results is one of the oldest FAQs we have... https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#How_can_I_get_ALL_the_matching_documents_back.3F_..._How_can_I_return_an_unlimited_number_of_rows.3F -Hoss http://www.lucidworks.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
