[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15308500#comment-15308500
 ] 

Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-6741:
--------------------------------------

Again assigned it to myself but if someone else wants to pick this up, please 
feel free.

I have no idea how this plays with LUCENE-7043 at all, but it _really_ looks 
like it should use the InetAddressPoint. I have no idea when I'll be able to 
even take a look. This JIRA though has a bunch of tests that we should respect 
and possibly expand to IPV6 as well.

I've had an offline conversation that claims that the current patch should have 
this change:
 protected static boolean isCidrPrefixInteger(String str) {
    return str.matches("^(3[0-2]|[1-2][0-9]|[1-9])$");
  }

Not putting it in the patch pending review of the patch itself to see how it 
would all fit.

> IPv6 Field Type
> ---------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-6741
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6741
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Lloyd Ramey
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>         Attachments: SOLR-6741.patch
>
>
> It would be nice if Solr had a field type which could be used to index IPv6 
> data and supported efficient range queries. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to