[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13015440#comment-13015440
 ] 

Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-2193:
---------------------------------------

bq. I've updated my patch to trunk.

hmm maybe I miss something but I don't see a patch on this issue.

bq. You can find the most recent work here: 
https://github.com/markrmiller/Lucene-Solr-Lab/commit/051995d50160e7081854febd471e72b9e81b8a3f
this seems to be good stuff why don't you create a branch for it?

simon


> Re-architect Update Handler
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2193
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2193
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Mark Miller
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>             Fix For: Next
>
>
> The update handler needs an overhaul.
> A few goals I think we might want to look at:
> 1. Cleanup - drop DirectUpdateHandler(2) line - move to something like 
> UpdateHandler, DefaultUpdateHandler
> 2. Expose the SolrIndexWriter in the api or add the proper abstractions to 
> get done what we now do with special casing:
> if (directupdatehandler2)
>   success
>  else
>   failish
> 3. Stop closing the IndexWriter and start using commit (still lazy IW init 
> though).
> 4. Drop iwAccess, iwCommit locks and sync mostly at the Lucene level.
> 5. Keep NRT support in mind.
> 6. Keep microsharding in mind (maintain logical index as multiple physical 
> indexes)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to