[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15328281#comment-15328281
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-6590:
--------------------------------------
Thanks for the ping, I had missed your previous message. The bug is that
queryNorm should not be 1.0 in the 5.5 explanation. There must be something
that by-passes query normalization somewhere. I believe your query was a simple
term query for description:obama, is it correct? Since I had run something
similar and did not reproduce the bug, I believe there must be something
specific to your setup that triggers this problem. Could you try to build a
reproducible test case so that I can dig what is happening, either an actual
test case or a sequence of commands that I can run against Solr to reproduce
the problem?
> Explore different ways to apply boosts
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6590
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6590
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.4
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6590.patch, LUCENE-6590.patch, LUCENE-6590.patch,
> LUCENE-6590.patch, LUCENE-6590.patch, LUCENE-6590.patch, LUCENE-6590.patch
>
>
> Follow-up from LUCENE-6570: the fact that all queries are mutable in order to
> allow for applying a boost raises issues since it makes queries bad cache
> keys since their hashcode can change anytime. We could just document that
> queries should never be modified after they have gone through IndexSearcher
> but it would be even better if the API made queries impossible to mutate at
> all.
> I think there are two main options:
> - either replace "void setBoost(boost)" with something like "Query
> withBoost(boost)" which would return a clone that has a different boost
> - or move boost handling outside of Query, for instance we could have a
> (immutable) query impl that would be dedicated to applying boosts, that
> queries that need to change boosts at rewrite time (such as BooleanQuery)
> would use as a wrapper.
> The latter idea is from Robert and I like it a lot given how often I either
> introduced or found a bug which was due to the boost parameter being ignored.
> Maybe there are other options, but I think this is worth exploring.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
