[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15332626#comment-15332626
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7219:
---------------------------------------------------------

Commit f4362098f7290104205403b86e901c767c0c4d22 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_5_5 from [~steve_rowe]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=f436209 ]

LUCENE-7219: Add CHANGES entry


> (Point|LegacyNumeric)RangeQuery builders to match queries' (lower|upper)Term 
> optionality logic
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7219
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7219
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Christine Poerschke
>            Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 5.x, 6.1, 6.0.1, master (7.0)
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7219.patch, LUCENE-7219.patch
>
>
> Currently the {{(Point|LegacyNumeric)RangeQuery}} queries themselves support 
> {{(lower|upper)Term}} optionality e.g. the lowerTerm could be omitted but the 
> {{(Point|LegacyNumeric)RangeQueryBuilder}} builders mandate 
> {{(lower|upper)Term}} attributes. This mismatch seems unintended.
> Proposed patch for ...QueryBuilder logic to match ...Query logic to follow.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to