[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15407382#comment-15407382
]
Varun Thacker commented on SOLR-9090:
-------------------------------------
Hi Christine,
Just curious - Why shouldn't directUpdatesToLeadersOnly be the default
behaviour?
If at a time of an update there are no leaders then won't the request fail
anyways?
> solrj CloudSolrClient: add directUpdatesToLeadersOnly support
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9090
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9090
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: SolrJ
> Reporter: Christine Poerschke
> Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 6.2, master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: SOLR-9090.patch, SOLR-9090.patch
>
>
> solrj CloudSolrClient: add directUpdatesToLeadersOnly support
> (Marvin Justice, Christine Poerschke)
> Proposed change:
> * Addition of a {{directUpdatesToLeadersOnly}} flag to allow clients to
> request that direct updates be sent to the shard leaders and only to the
> shard leaders.
> Motivation:
> * In a scenario where there is temporarily no shard leader the update request
> will 'fail fast' allowing the client to handle retry logic.
> Related tickets:
> * SOLR-6312 concerns the ((currently) no longer used) {{updatesToLeaders}}
> flag. The updatesToLeaders logic however appears to be slightly different
> from the proposed directUpdatesToLeadersOnly logic: {{updatesToLeaders}}
> indicates that sending to leaders is preferred but not mandatory whereas
> {{directUpdatesToLeadersOnly}} mandates sending to leaders only.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
