[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15424822#comment-15424822
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-7413 at 8/17/16 4:14 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
bq. Anyway, is it possible to move them to backward-codecs without changing
package names? The naming changes make backporting from 7 to 6 unnecessarily
harder.
This has 2 reasons:
- modularization in Java 9 does not allow same package in different JAR files.
We want at some point move master to java 9 and make real modules or of it.
- javadocs in Java 8 already have the duplicate packages problem! It isn't able
to handle same package in different compilation units.
was (Author: thetaphi):
This has 2 reasons:
- modularization in Java 9 does not allow same package in different JAR files.
We want at some point move master to java 9 and make real modules or of it.
- javadocs in Java 8 already have the duplicate packages problem! It isn't able
to handle same package in different compilation units.
> move legacy numeric support to backwards module
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7413
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7413
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Fix For: master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-7413.patch
>
>
> This code is deprecated since 6.0, but still sits in master branch in core.
> I think we should move it to the backwards module as a step towards removing
> it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
