Perhaps then something other than "configuration" -- perhaps some request param flag -- I dunno. But it's too easy to shoot yourself in the foot. I'm glad we have the feature/capability though.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:46 PM Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:17 PM, David Smiley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I think it's a bad thing that we let you do queries on a field with > > docValues that has no index *by default* -- i.e. without some field type > > attribute where you expressly allow it because you know what you're > doing. > > I'm not sure I agree. Indexes can make things faster, and it's a > feature that you can do a range query w/o indexing. > Just as it's a feature that you can do a range query on a field w/o a > precision step. > IMO, adding configuration for every mistake that one *could* make > would make things worse. > > -Yonik > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
