[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15442114#comment-15442114
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9374:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit 5a16f1526057c5faac1f552d4e4caa364a50fccf in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_6x from [~shalinmangar]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=5a16f15 ]

SOLR-9374: Speed up Jmx MBean retrieval for FieldCache
(cherry picked from commit b1b933e)


> Speed up Jmx MBean retrieval for FieldCache
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9374
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9374
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: JMX, web gui
>    Affects Versions: 6.1, master (7.0)
>            Reporter: Tim Owen
>            Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: master (7.0), 6.3
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-9374.patch
>
>
> The change made in SOLR-8892 allowed for Jmx requests for MBean info to skip 
> displaying the full contents of FieldCache entries, and just return the count.
> However, it still computes all the field cache entry info but throws it away 
> and uses only the number of entries. This can make the Jmx MBean retrieval 
> quite slow which is not ideal for regular polling for monitoring purposes. 
> We've typically found the Jmx call took over 1 minute to complete, and jstack 
> output showed that building the stats for this bean was the culprit.
> With this patch, the time is much reduced, usually less than 10 seconds. The 
> response contents are unchanged.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to