OK, great then. Another issue, however, is the PDF seems to be missing the logo on the title page. This wasn't a problem for the last release (I checked it again to be sure).
I checked the location of the logo image file, and it is still correct. I also checked the intermediate HTML and it contains the correct reference to the file location. However, the HTML refers to the online image, so when I view that I see the logo because it's accessible to me. Somehow it's not getting downloaded to be included with the PDF when that is generated. The PDF seemed to take a very long time to generate (I did it 2x), so it's possible there is some network issue causing a problem. I recommend waiting a few hours, or until tomorrow morning, and checking again. If it's still a problem, we should raise an issue with INFRA for investigation. On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Varun Thacker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Cassandra, > > Uwe's already made the changes . > > > Regarding the RC: > I had a doubt when I was documenting SOLR-9038 so I'll wait to hear back on > the Jira. Hopefully I can wrap that up soon and then cut an RC today > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Cassandra Targett <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hey Varun, >> >> You may want to email Uwe directly without cc'ing the list. He's said >> in the past that he missed the requests because of his email >> filtering, and it's better to email him directly so it doesn't get >> lost. >> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Varun Thacker <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Uwe, >> > >> > Could you please update the CWIKI Javadoc macro links to point to the >> > 6_2_0 >> > paths. >> > >> > I'll start the release process for the ref guide soon afterwards. >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Varun, >> >> >> >> I didn't get a chance yet to document the new streaming expressions. >> >> I'm >> >> on vacation this week. I'm planning on updating the docs early next >> >> week. If >> >> the docs release before then, people can read about the new streaming >> >> expressions online. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 29, 2016 10:13 AM, "Varun Thacker" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi Everyone, >> >>> >> >>> I think the majority of the changes are in place. I will try to make >> >>> the >> >>> necessary changes required for SOLR-9187/SOLR-9038/SOLR-9243 later >> >>> today. >> >>> >> >>> I'm not sure where in >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Using+SolrJ can we >> >>> document >> >>> SOLR-9090 . It seems like we need to beef up the SolrJ page in >> >>> general? >> >>> >> >>> Joel, have you been able to add the new features in streaming >> >>> expressions >> >>> to the ref guide? I can help review it >> >>> >> >>> I will aim to create an RC tomorrow morning in IST hours. >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Varun Thacker <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi Cassandra, >> >>>> >> >>>> I can volunteer to be the RM for the ref guide. >> >>>> >> >>>> We probably won't get to all the TODOs but I think let's start >> >>>> working >> >>>> on it for the next few days. >> >>>> >> >>>> If its fine we can cut an RC on Monday 29th August and then have the >> >>>> ref >> >>>> guide released later in the week. >> >>>> >> >>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Noble Paul <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I shall document my changes today itself >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>> > Hi Cassandra, >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > I'm also behind on documentation for this release and on vacation >> >>>>> > next week. >> >>>>> > But I will attempt to make progress on the docs this week and do >> >>>>> > some >> >>>>> > documentation while on vacation as well. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Joel Bernstein >> >>>>> > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Cassandra Targett >> >>>>> > <[email protected]> >> >>>>> > wrote: >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> The vote for Lucene/Solr 6.2 has passed already, but the release >> >>>>> >> process for the Ref Guide has barely started. >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> I'm in an offsite meeting this week, and next week have another >> >>>>> >> project to focus on. Hoss is offline until early September. >> >>>>> >> So...the >> >>>>> >> 2 >> >>>>> >> people who normally do the majority of the work to prepare and >> >>>>> >> publish >> >>>>> >> the Ref Guide aren't available. >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> I've made a rather barebones TODO list, pulled only from the New >> >>>>> >> Features section of CHANGES (other sections should be reviewed >> >>>>> >> also, >> >>>>> >> however. I won't really have time to do much more, and can't be >> >>>>> >> the >> >>>>> >> Release Manager right now. >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> Essentially, if you care to have a 6.2 Ref Guide, I'm asking for >> >>>>> >> volunteers for any/all of the following: >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> - document the changes you committed >> >>>>> >> - help document changes someone else committed >> >>>>> >> - offer to be the RM and shepherd the publication process, which >> >>>>> >> is >> >>>>> >> fully documented >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> If no one steps up to help get it published soon, it's going to >> >>>>> >> be >> >>>>> >> at >> >>>>> >> least a few weeks until I'll have time to devote much time on it. >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> Cassandra >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> Noble Paul >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
