[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Drob updated SOLR-9330:
----------------------------
Attachment: SOLR-9330.patch
[~mkhludnev] - that looks like a good start to a test. I do not think 10
seconds is long enough to relegate something to @Nightly runs.
I'm putting up an alternative fix that seems to also make your test pass. I
think I like my approach better because it may still return partial results
when able, but I'm also not convinced that there won't be other handlers that
suffer from similar problems that are still not addressed. Your approach may be
able to fix everything at once.
Maybe the best solution is to do both things.
> Race condition between core reload and statistics request
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9330
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9330
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Affects Versions: 5.5
> Reporter: Andrey Kudryavtsev
> Attachments: SOLR-9330.patch, SOLR-9390.patch, SOLR-9390.patch
>
>
> Things happened that we execute this two requests consecutively in Solr 5.5:
> * Core reload: /admin/cores?action=RELOAD&core=_coreName_
> * Check core statistics: /_coreName_/admin/mbeans?stats=true
> And sometimes second request ends with this error:
> {code}
> ERROR org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall -
> null:org.apache.lucene.store.AlreadyClosedException: this IndexReader is
> closed
> at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.ensureOpen(IndexReader.java:274)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader.getVersion(StandardDirectoryReader.java:331)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.index.FilterDirectoryReader.getVersion(FilterDirectoryReader.java:119)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.index.FilterDirectoryReader.getVersion(FilterDirectoryReader.java:119)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.getStatistics(SolrIndexSearcher.java:2404)
> at
> org.apache.solr.handler.admin.SolrInfoMBeanHandler.addMBean(SolrInfoMBeanHandler.java:164)
> at
> org.apache.solr.handler.admin.SolrInfoMBeanHandler.getMBeanInfo(SolrInfoMBeanHandler.java:134)
> at
> org.apache.solr.handler.admin.SolrInfoMBeanHandler.handleRequestBody(SolrInfoMBeanHandler.java:65)
> at
> org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:155)
> at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:2082)
> at org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.execute(HttpSolrCall.java:670)
> at org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.call(HttpSolrCall.java:458)
> at
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:225)
> at
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:183)
> {code}
> If my understanding of SolrCore internals is correct, it happens because of
> async nature of reload request:
> * New searcher is "registered" in separate thread
> * Old searcher is closed in same separate thread and only after new one is
> registered
> * When old searcher is closing, it removes itself from map with MBeans
> * If statistic requests happens before old searcher is completely removed
> from everywhere - exception can happen.
> What do you think if we will introduce new parameter for reload request which
> makes it fully synchronized? Basically it will force it to call {code}
> SolrCore#getSearcher(boolean forceNew, boolean returnSearcher, final Future[]
> waitSearcher, boolean updateHandlerReopens) {code} with waitSearcher!= null
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
