[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15535974#comment-15535974
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-5064:
------------------------------------
BTW; just wanted to mention that the last time I looked, Woodstox is *not* in
fact actually explicitly used by SolrJ; it is used indirectly simply by being
on the classpath. But Java comes with implementations of StAX, so Woodstox is
not actually needed. Once upon a time, like back in Java 1.6 (or maybe it was
1.5), somebody here saw that Woodstox was a lot faster than Java's impl, and so
it was included. I suspect Java's impl has improved a lot since then. I think
it's very dubious to include this dependency in SolrJ, particularly with our
Javabin default codec. SolrJ should have minimal dependencies because every
Solr client out there has to use it and integrate with *their* dependencies.
> Update <dependency org="org.codehaus.woodstox" name="wstx-asl" rev="3.2.7"
> transitive="false"/> to a more recent version.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-5064
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5064
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Priority: Minor
>
> @whoschek mentioned to me earlier that we were using a fairly old version.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
