[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15565052#comment-15565052
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7474:
--------------------------------------------

A sparse set in the nightly benchmarks is an interesting idea.  Do you have a 
data set in mind?

At some point I'll write up a blog post summarizing the change and I can also 
try to do a before (6.x) / after (upcoming 7.0) one-time performance test for 
that.

> Improve doc values writers
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7474
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7474
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Assignee: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: master (7.0)
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7474.patch
>
>
> One of the goals of the new iterator-based API is to better handle sparse 
> data. However, the current doc values writers still use a dense 
> representation, and some of them perform naive linear scans in the nextDoc 
> implementation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to