[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15583004#comment-15583004
 ] 

Mike commented on SOLR-9651:
----------------------------

I haven't read the super long SOLR-5944 issue, but the one thing I'll say about 
external file fields that's wonderful is that they can be updated in a flash. 
For a database with millions of documents, I can update them all just by 
updating a single file. That's very powerful and it'd be a shame if EFF were 
deprecated and I had to send a gazillion update queries to Solr to do the same.

> Consider tracking modification time of external file fields for faster 
> reloading
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9651
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>    Affects Versions: 4.10.4
>         Environment: Linux
>            Reporter: Mike
>
> I have an index of about 4M legal documents that has pagerank boosting 
> configured as an external file field. The external file is about 100MB in 
> size and has one row per document in the index. Each row indicates the 
> pagerank score of a document. When we open new searchers, this file has to 
> get reloaded, and it creates a noticeable delay for our users -- takes 
> several seconds to reload. 
> An idea to fix this came up in [a recent discussion in the Solr mailing 
> list|https://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg125521.html]:
>  Could the file only be reloaded if it has changed on disk? In other words, 
> when new searchers are opened, could they check the modtime of the file, and 
> avoid reloading it if the file hasn't changed? 
> In our configuration, this would be a big improvement. We only change the 
> pagerank file once/week because computing it is intensive and new documents 
> don't tend to have a big impact. At the same time, because we're regularly 
> adding new documents, we do hundreds of commits per day, all of which have a 
> delay as the (largish) external file field is reloaded. 
> Is this a reasonable improvement to request? 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to