[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15585707#comment-15585707 ]
Pushkar Raste commented on SOLR-9506: ------------------------------------- I think what Yonik is implying is that, if for some reason, replica does not apply delete properly, index fingerprint would still checkout and that would be a problem. Considering the issues with {{PeerSync}}, should add that option {{recoverWithReplicationOnly}} ? For most of the setups I doubt if people would have hundreds of thousands of records in updateLog in which which almost no one is using {{PeerSync}} anyway > cache IndexFingerprint for each segment > --------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-9506 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9506 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Reporter: Noble Paul > Attachments: SOLR-9506.patch, SOLR-9506.patch, SOLR-9506_POC.patch > > > The IndexFingerprint is cached per index searcher. it is quite useless during > high throughput indexing. If the fingerprint is cached per segment it will > make it vastly more efficient to compute the fingerprint -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org