[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15645187#comment-15645187
]
Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-9293:
-----------------------------------
I don't think we have any formal processes (if I understand your acronyms
right). To me common sense and trust I have in other people's judgement
typically works best. This applies to both when asking for help on solutions
I'm not so confident in and when I think there's simply not that much to
discuss because the patch/commit is trivial or self-explanatory.
This particular issue was filed by me a good while ago, it doesn't change
anything in terms of existing functionality and it patched a functional hole
with means that are neither controversial, nor that difficult to understand. I
honestly didn't think it was worth bothering people with requests for reviews
of something that is, in essence, a trivial extension of existing code.
Obviously you do have the right to speak up if there's something wrong with a
commit. And I'm more then willing to revert and reiterate if this is the case.
> Solrj client support for hierarchical clusters and other topics marker
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9293
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9293
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Dawid Weiss
> Assignee: Dawid Weiss
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: master (7.0), 6.4
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
