[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15664701#comment-15664701
]
Julian Hyde commented on SOLR-8593:
-----------------------------------
CALCITE-1306 covers this. It's not standard SQL but could be enabled via an
extension.
I disagree that "Solr will run this filter faster than Calcite". With query
optimization, both queries will produce identical plans. This issue is not
about performance. It is about syntactic sugar (not that there's anything wrong
with that).
> Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Joel Bernstein
> Assignee: Joel Bernstein
> Attachments: SOLR-8593.patch
>
>
> The Presto SQL Parser was perfect for phase one of the SQLHandler. It was
> nicely split off from the larger Presto project and it did everything that
> was needed for the initial implementation.
> Phase two of the SQL work though will require an optimizer. Here is where
> Apache Calcite comes into play. It has a battle tested cost based optimizer
> and has been integrated into Apache Drill and Hive.
> This work can begin in trunk following the 6.0 release. The final query plans
> will continue to be translated to Streaming API objects (TupleStreams), so
> continued work on the JDBC driver should plug in nicely with the Calcite work.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
