[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15674880#comment-15674880
 ] 

Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-9296:
--------------------------------------

Looks like "Never mind".

[~noble.paul] I'm curious what your take is...

My original motivation was seeing that SortingResponseWriter had a bunch of 
toString() entries that seemed unnecessary, things like:

out.write(Integer.toString((int) vals.get(docId)));

So I was put this patch together to measure if, indeed, this was something that 
could be made more efficient. It seems to me like with the work already done 
with MapWriter and the future work linked to this JIRA that this particular 
JIRA now seems obsolete,  

I'll close it tomorrow unless people think it's valuable.. I confess I haven't 
measured object creation...




> Examine SortingResponseWriter with an eye towards removing extra object 
> creation
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9296
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9296
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>    Affects Versions: 6.2, master (7.0)
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>         Attachments: SOLR-9296.patch
>
>
> Assigning to myself just to keep from losing track it. Anyone who wants to 
> take it, please feel free!
> While looking at SOLR-9166 I noticed that SortingResponseWriter does a 
> toString for each field it writes out. At a _very_ preliminary examination it 
> seems like we create a lot of String objects that need to be GC'd. Could we 
> reduce this by using some kind of CharsRef/ByteBuffer/Whatever?
> I've only looked at this briefly, not quite sure what the gotchas are but 
> throwing it out for discussion.
> Some initial thoughts:
> 1> for the fixed types (numerics, dates, booleans) there's a strict upper 
> limit on the size of each value so we can allocate something up-front.
> 2> for string fields, we already get a chars ref so just pass that through?
> 3> must make sure that whatever does the actual writing transfers all the 
> bytes before returning.
> I'm sure I won't get to this for a week or perhaps more, so grab it if you 
> have the bandwidth.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to