[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15753323#comment-15753323
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9712:
------------------------------------
bq. If the CHANGES.txt is no more clear than the title of this issue then users
won't realize what this is all about
Heh... yep. I often ignore the original JIRA title for the commit message +
CHANGES entry and try to pick something that means the most to developers for
the former and users for the latter. This change should probably go under the
"change of behavior" section.
> Saner default for maxWarmingSearchers
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9712
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9712
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: search
> Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Fix For: master (7.0), 6.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-9712.patch, SOLR-9712.patch, SOLR-9712.patch
>
>
> As noted in SOLR-9710, the default for maxWarmingSearchers is
> Integer.MAX_VALUE which is just crazy. Let's have a saner default. Today we
> log a performance warning when the number of on deck searchers goes over 1.
> What if we had the default as 1 that expert users can increase if needed?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
