[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Khludnev resolved SOLR-9620.
------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 6.4
It's resolved only in {{6x}}, since {{master (7.0)}} doesn't support join by
numeric.
> {!join score=.. fromIndex=..} throws "undefined field" for numeric field if
> from and to schemas are different
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9620
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9620
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Affects Versions: 6.3
> Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
> Assignee: Mikhail Khludnev
> Fix For: 6.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-9620.patch
>
>
> numeric "from" field is mistakenly looked in "to" schema. see
> org.apache.solr.search.join.ScoreJoinQParserPlugin.....parse()
> {code}
> private Query createQuery(final String fromField, final String
> fromQueryStr,
> String fromIndex, final String toField,
> final ScoreMode scoreMode,
> boolean byPassShortCircutCheck) throws
> SyntaxError {
> + FieldType.LegacyNumericType fromNumericType =
> req.getSchema().getField(fromField).getType().getNumericType();
> + FieldType.LegacyNumericType toNumericType =
> req.getSchema().getField(toField).getType().getNumericType();
> {code}
> it's in branch_6x only. Users who are faced this are advised to just declare
> "from" field in "to" schema. It should work. Take care.
> one line fix and improvements for TestCrossCoreJoin.java are quite welcome.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
