[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15811696#comment-15811696
]
Christine Poerschke commented on LUCENE-7624:
---------------------------------------------
bq. ... I think it's a generally useful query, and would fit in perfectly well
in core.
I agree. Already (singular) TermQuery is in core and it would be logical for
(plural) TermsQuery to be in the same module. Historically (pre LUCENE-6270)
TermsQuery used to be TermsFilter which perhaps explains its location in the
queries rather than the core module.
> Consider moving TermsQuery to core
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7624
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7624
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Alan Woodward
> Assignee: Alan Woodward
>
> TermsQuery current sits in the queries module, but it's used in both
> spatial-extras and in facets, and currently is the only reason that the
> facets module has a dependency on queries. I think it's a generally useful
> query, and would fit in perfectly well in core.
> This would also allow us to explore rewriting BooleanQuery to TermsQuery to
> avoid the max-clauses limit
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
