[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15832366#comment-15832366
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7649:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit c9262602f06d3fdaa2ec8809a6948aaed72bc0b1 in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/branch_6x from Chris Hostetter
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=c926260 ]
SOLR-10013: Fix DV range query bug introduced by LUCENE-7643 by disabling and
optimization (LUCENE-7649 to track re-enabling or removing completely)
Conflicts:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/document/SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery.java
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/document/SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery.java
> investigate re-adding unwrapSingleton optimization attempted by LUCENE-7643
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7649
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7649
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Assignee: Adrien Grand
>
> as part of some refactoring done in LUCENE-7643, an optimization for was
> introduced for some single valued cases, which introduced an NPE risk
> surfaced in SOLR-10013.
> I plan to fix SOLR-10013 by disabling this optimization with a comment
> pointing to this issue, and commit with it a lucene level test steve wrote
> that _usualy_ fails with the optimized code (since it doesn't fail 100% of
> the time, it suggests the failure is related to the RandomizedIndexWriter -
> the docs and queries are fixed)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
