Hi Ishan,

LUCENE-7657 is only an issue with caches that use queries as cache keys,
which does not seem to be the case with fingerprinting. So fingerprinting
should be fine since I see it uses weak keys.

Le mer. 25 janv. 2017 à 13:18, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
[email protected]> a écrit :

> +1 for 6.4.1.
>
> Solr's IndexFingerprinting uses
> IndexReader.getCombinedCoreAndDeletesKey(). I'm wondering whether that is
> affected by LUCENE-7657?
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:37 PM, jim ferenczi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> +1
> If you need help for the release... ;)
>
>
> 2017-01-25 12:57 GMT+01:00 Michael McCandless <[email protected]>:
>
> +1
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Two potential memory leaks have been reported recently:
> >  - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647
> >  - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657
> >
> > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> includes
> > these fixes. If this is fine with everyone, I'll commit the patches
> attached
> > to these issues later today and will also look at whether there are other
> > bug fixes that should be backported. I'm currently thinking of building
> the
> > RC next Monday to give CI some time to ensure these patches do not cause
> > problems.
> >
> > Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to