[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849160#comment-15849160
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-8593:
--------------------------------------
Hi, [~julianhyde],
The exact problem I'm seeing is that the SolrSort is not included in the query
plan unless an ORDER BY is used in the query.
With the ORDER BY our tree looks like this:
org.apache.solr.handler.sql.SolrSort
org.apache.solr.handler.sql.SolrProject
org.apache.solr.handler.sql.SolrTableScan
Without the ORDER BY our tree looks like this:
org.apache.solr.handler.sql.SolrProject
org.apache.solr.handler.sql.SolrTableScan
> Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Parallel SQL
> Reporter: Joel Bernstein
> Assignee: Joel Bernstein
> Fix For: 6.5, master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: SOLR-8593.patch, SOLR-8593.patch, SOLR-8593.patch
>
>
> The Presto SQL Parser was perfect for phase one of the SQLHandler. It was
> nicely split off from the larger Presto project and it did everything that
> was needed for the initial implementation.
> Phase two of the SQL work though will require an optimizer. Here is where
> Apache Calcite comes into play. It has a battle tested cost based optimizer
> and has been integrated into Apache Drill and Hive.
> This work can begin in trunk following the 6.0 release. The final query plans
> will continue to be translated to Streaming API objects (TupleStreams), so
> continued work on the JDBC driver should plug in nicely with the Calcite work.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
